|
11/12/2008 – NEW FATF/MENA-FATF MUTUAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR QATAR: THE LAWYER’S PERSPECTIVE:
The Middle East and North African Financial Action Task Force (MENA-FATF) and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) have released their mutual evaluation report on Qatar. The report discusses a wide range of issues in relation to the prevention of money laundering and counter terrorist financing activities in Qatar.
Client Due Diligence:
The report calls for the legal profession to face tougher client due diligence requirements. Although lawyers in Qatar are required to verify and identify their clients, both corporate entities and individuals, the report states that these requirements are insufficient; the report calls for increased due diligence to be applied to cover the identification and verification of the beneficial owner and for due diligence to be regarded as an ongoing requirement throughout the client-lawyer relationship. Moreover, the report calls for enhanced provisions relating to:
-
Obtaining information on the purpose and intended nature of all business relationships undertaken by a legal professional;
-
Higher risk categories of client to face more stringent due diligence checks and for the legislation to include enhanced checks for unusual transactions;
-
A timescale by which client due diligence should have been carried out by and a detailed account of the penalties a legal professional will face if he fails to complete satisfactory client due diligence checks;
-
A more detailed record of client transactions should be kept.
Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR):
The report also criticises the reporting requirements relating to the legal profession. The report expresses that there is avid confusion over the process of reporting any transaction suspected of being related to AML/CFT in relation to the current legal profession privilege rules in existence. It has been expressed that the current rules relating to STR and legal professional privilege has placed lawyers in a confusing situation; a STR would clearly breach the current requirements of confidentiality, however, many legal professionals believe that they must make a STR in order to avoid to be treated as an accomplice in a potential ML or FT scheme.
The report therefore calls for lawyers to have ‘immunity’ from incurring liability (in relation to breaching legal professional privilege) when making a STR.
Tipping Off:
The report states that the AML Law should include the offence of tipping off in relation to Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions (DNFBPs), including lawyers; in particular, they should take into account a prohibition from disclosing the fact that a STR has been made and that information related to the STR has been provided to the Financial Intelligence Unit.
The mission recommended conducting training session to train employees on matters and obligations relating to AML/CFT and called for improved regulation of the legal profession to ensure their compliance with AML/CFT requirements.
A full copy of the report is available here.
Back to top.
|