Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC)
Lawyers are covered by Section 15A of the Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 (FTRA)
At this stage lawyers are only regulated as reporting entities under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (the AML/CTF Act) to the extent that they provide services that are in direct competition with the financial sector.
The Federal Government has released a set of draft amendments to the AML/CTF Act which, if implemented, would extend the application of the AML/CTF Act to a range of services ordinarily provided by lawyers and other professionals. The Federal Government is currently consulting with various bodies, including the Law Council of Australia, in relation to these amendments.
THE LEGISLATION
The Australian AML/CTF regime is contained in the following:
FINANCIAL TRANSACTION REPORTS ACT 1988
The FTRA was enacted in 1988 to provide for reporting of certain transactions, verification of customers and the establishment of a Financial Intelligence Unit (AUSTRAC).
The FTRA imposes obligations on 'cash dealers' to;
Lawyers are not 'cash dealers' for the purposes of the FTRA. However, lawyers must report significant cash transactions. Section 15A of the FTRA requires that:
Section 15A will no longer impose any obligations on a lawyer after 12 December 2008, where the lawyer is a reporting entity under the AML/CTF Act and the transaction is a designated service under that Act. In those circumstances the obligation to report will be replaced by section 43 of the AML/CTF Act.
The Australian Government has introduced a bill into Parliament to allow reporting entities who currently report to AUSTRAC under the FTRA to continue to report in the same way during their transition to the new reporting format. This applies to threshold transactions, international funds transfer instructions, or suspicious matter reports made after 12 December 2008, until such a time as such entities are compliant with the AML/CTF Act reporting requirements, but not later than 11 March 2010.1
Failure to report is a criminal offence and may attract fines of up to AUD 165,000 for corporations and fines of up to AUD 33,00 and/or 5 years imprisonment for individuals.
Lawyers are not required to report suspicious transactions under the FTRA.
ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTER-TERRORISM FINANCING ACT 2006
Overview
The AML/CTF Act received Royal Assent in December 2006. It was subsequently amended by the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Act 2007 (references herein to the AML/CTF Act are to the Act as amended).
The AML/CTF Act makes a number of improvements to Australia's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regime, bringing it in line with international standards issued by the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF).
The AML/CTF Act constitutes the first tranche of AML/CTF reforms intended to cover services provided by the financial sector (or lawyers, accountants and others that provide services in direct competition with the financial sector), the gambling sector and by bullion dealers.
The Federal Government has said that it intends to introduce a second tranche of reforms that will extend AML/CTF obligations to others (including lawyers, accountants and real estate agents) when they provide specified non-financial services. This process has already commenced with the issue of a set of draft amendments to the AML/CTF Act and the commencement of a public consultation process.
The description of the AML/CTF Act and regime described below does not yet apply to lawyers unless they are providing services in direct competition with the financial sector. However, once the amendments are approved, the description below may apply to legal professions acting in the traditional role of a legal professional.
The AML/CTF regime
In essence, the AML/CTF Act imposes obligations on entities (reporting entities) that provide certain financial services that are listed in the Act (designated services).
The AML/CTF Act is supplemented by Regulations which are mainly technical in nature and AML/CTF Rules (the Rules) which contain the practical, operational detail of how to comply with the obligations in the AML/CTF Act. The Rules have legislative force.
AUSTRAC has also issued a number of Guidance Notes and other material to assist reporting entities to comply with their obligations.
The risk-based approach
Generally, the AML/CTF Act and Rules adopt a risk based approach that allows reporting entities to assess and mitigate their money laundering and terrorism financing (ML/TF) risk and concentrate their resources on areas where their ML/TF risk is determined to be higher.
There is no provision in the AML/CTF Act specifically requiring reporting entities to conduct a ML/TF risk assessment on their business. However, this can be inferred from the fact that AUSTRAC can, where it is satisfied that a reporting entity has not carried out an ML/TF risk assessment, or that its assessment is out of date or inadequate, compel it do so and report to AUSTRAC,
Additionally, as a practical matter, it will be necessary for a reporting entity to carry out an ML/TF risk assessment to enable it to develop and implement an AML/CTF program that is suitable for its business (and meets the requirements set out in the AML/CTF Act and the Rules).
There are some specific obligations under the AML/CTF Act that are prescriptive, eg, the obligation to collect and verify minimum customer identification information before providing a financial service to a customer, but other obligations, such as the requirement to obtain additional know your customer (KYC) information, reflect the risk-based approach.
Timing
The AML/CTF Act is being implemented in stages over two years as follows:
- Electronic fund transfer instructions (EFTIs) and records about EFTIs;
- Maintaining records relating to transactions, customer provided transaction documents and transferred accounts;
- Registration of designated remittance arrangers; and
- Reports on cross border movements of currency and bearer negotiable instruments.
- Correspondent banking and records relating to correspondent banking
- Customer identification and records of identification procedures
- AML/CTF programs
- Compliance reporting
- Ongoing customer due diligence; and suspicious matter and threshold reporting.
A 15-month prosecution free period applies in respect of each of the stages outlined above. The Policy (Civil Penalty Orders) Principles 2006 (the Policy Principles) provide that during the relevant 15 month period AUSTRAC will only take enforcement action against a reporting entity for a contravention of a provision where the AUSTRAC CEO is reasonably satisfied that the reporting entity has failed to take reasonable steps to comply with that provision.
The Policy Principles state that in making that decision the AUSTRAC CEO will take into account all relevant matters, including:
Core obligations
Core obligations under the AML/CTF Act include enhanced customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, threshold and suspicious matter reporting, fund transfer requirements, record keeping, correspondent banking controls, the implementation of an anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing program and compliance reporting.
Customer due diligence
In general, reporting entities must not provide a designated service to a new customer without having first identified and verified the identification of that customer. This obligation does not apply to customers (existing customers) who were provided with a designated service by the reporting entity prior to 12 December 2007.
The customer identification and verification requirements (also referred to as KYC requirements) are set out in the Rules. The level of due diligence to be undertaken will depend on the type of customer.
For example, there are different requirements for individuals, corporations, trusts, partnerships, associations, co-operatives and government bodies.
Simplified verification procedures are available for domestic listed companies and some regulated trusts. For other types of customers, more detailed information (including information on directors, beneficial owners and trust beneficiaries) may be required.
In certain circumstances, e.g., where a suspicious matter arises, it may be necessary for a reporting entity to carry out a customer identification procedure on an existing customer or to re-verify a customer that has already been the subject of a customer identification procedure.
Ongoing customer due diligence
Reporting entities will also be required to monitor their provision of designated services (to ensure that they identify and mitigate their ML/TF risk on a continuous basis). According to draft rules recently published by AUSTRAC, this means that reporting entities will need to implement KYC systems, transaction monitoring and enhanced customer due diligence as part of their AML/CTF programs.
Reporting requirements
The AML/CTF Act requires reporting entities to report suspicious matters, transactions above a certain threshold and international funds transfer instructions to AUSTRAC.
Suspicious matter reporting
The suspicious matter reporting requirements require reporting entities to make a report to AUSTRAC if they suspect on reasonable grounds that:
A suspicion and the grounds on which it is based must be reported to AUSTRAC within 3 business days of forming the suspicion (or 24 hours if the suspicion relates to terrorism financing).
Legal professional privilege overrides the requirement to make a report to AUSTRAC.
Tipping off is an offence. However, disclosure to a lawyer to obtain legal advice is permitted and disclosure by a lawyer, accountant or other person specified in the Rules is also permitted if the information relates to the affairs of a customer and is made for the purpose of dissuading the customer from tax evasion or a criminal offence.
Threshold reporting
Reporting entities who commence to provide or provide a designated service that involves a threshold transaction must report the transaction to AUSTRAC within 10 business days of it occurring. A threshold transaction is a transaction that involves the transfer of physical currency where the total amount of the physical currency transferred is not less than AUD$10,000, or a transaction which involves the transfer of money in the form of e-currency where the total amount of the e-currency transferred is not less than AUD$10,000.
International funds transfer instructions
Consistent with a long-standing obligation under the FTRA, a reporting entity that sends or receives any International Funds Transfer Instructions (IFTIs) must report all such instructions, regardless of the amount, to AUSTRAC within 10 business days after the instruction was sent or received.
Reporting as a defence
If a person provides information to AUSTRAC in accordance with a suspicious matter, threshold or IFTI reporting obligation, that person is taken not to have been in possession of that particular information at any time (therefore providing the person with a defence to the substantive money laundering and terrorism financing offences in the Criminal Code (Cth)).
Electronic funds transfer instructions
Part 5 of the AML/CTF Act is intended to implement FATF SR VII (wire transfers). It does so by providing that electronic funds transfer instructions (EFTIs) must include certain information about the origin of the transferred money.
The obligation applies to ADIs, banks, building societies, credit unions or other persons specified in the Rules.
Register of providers of Designated Remittance Services
Reporting entities are expressly prohibited from providing a registrable designated remittance service unless they have provided AUSTRAC with their names and details. The information provided will be included in a register to be maintained by AUSTRAC. The broad definition of a 'designated remittance arrangement' means any entity, other than those excluded by the AML/CTF Act or the Rules, which accepts money or property from one party to transfer to another where the money or property is received in one jurisdiction and paid out in another.
The AML/CTF program
A reporting entity must put in place and maintain an AML/CTF program. Generally an AML/CTF program must be divided into two distinct parts – Parts A and B.
Part A: the general program
The primary purpose of Part A (the general part) is to identify, mitigate and manage the risk that a reporting entity may reasonably face that the provision of designated services at, or through, a permanent establishment in Australia might (inadvertently or otherwise) involve or facilitate:
Part A must include risk awareness training and employee due diligence programs, procedures for board and senior management oversight, independent auditing and the appointment of a Money Laundering Compliance Officer.
Some general principles apply to the implementation of an AML/CTF program.
Part B: customer identification procedures
Part B of an AML/CTF program sets out a reporting entity's customer identification procedures. Some general principles apply.
Record keeping
Generally, reporting entities will be required to retain records (or copies of records) for seven years. The record keeping obligations apply to:
Compliance reporting
Reporting entities are required to file a Compliance Report with AUSTRAC by 31 March 2008 as to their compliance with the AML/CTF Act for the period 12 December 2006 to 31 December 2007. This will be a continuing obligation although the reporting periods may change.
The Rules
As at 31 January 2008, AML/CTF Rules relating to the following have been made and registered:AUSTRAC has also issued Guidance Notes on the following matters:
An AML/CTF Act reporting implementation policy was released on 19th September, 2008. This policy outlines seven new reportable details forms and four reporting methods that AUSTRAC has designed to meet the size and technology requirements of reporting entities. The policy also provides information for new reporting entities, as well as those reporting entities which have been reporting to AUSTRAC as cash dealers under the FTRA.1
This policy can be found at:The money laundering offences are contained in Part 10.2 of the Schedule to the Criminal Code Act.
The offences apply to all persons including lawyers.
Sections 400.3 to 400.8 of the Criminal Code make it an offence to deal with money or property that is either the proceeds of or may become an instrument of crime.
A person deals with money or other property if they:
And the money or other property is the proceeds of crime or could become an instrument of crime, in relation to a Commonwealth, state, Australian Capital Territory, Northern Territory or foreign indictable offence.
A foreign indictable offence is an offence against a law of a foreign country which, if it had occurred in Australia, would be a Commonwealth offence or a law of an Australian state or territory connected with the offence and may be dealt with on indictment.
Sections 400.3-400.8 of the Criminal Code set out a sliding scale of six money laundering offences structured according to the value of the money or property involved. Section 400.3 applies where the value of the money or property is worth $1 million or more. At the bottom end of the scale section 400.8 applies to offences where the money or property is of any value.
Each section is further structured according to the element of fault involved. The most serious offence is committed where the money or property is, and the person believes it to be, the proceeds of crime, or intends that it will be become an instrument of crime. The mid-level offence is committed in circumstances where the money or property is the proceeds of crime or there is a risk that it will become an instrument of crime and the person is reckless as to those facts. The lowest level offence is committed where the person is negligent as to the facts.
Penalties are on a sliding scale according to the value of the money or property and the seriousness of the fault element. The maximum penalty is 25 years imprisonment or 1500 penalty points or both.
Section 400.9 of the Criminal Code creates the offence of receiving, possessing, concealing, or disposing or bringing into or taking out of Australia any money or other property that may reasonably be suspected of being the proceeds of an indictable offence.
The underlying predicate offences on which the money laundering offences are founded are all offences which are indictable offences. Section 400.13 of the Criminal Code provides that the prosecution does not have to prove what the underlying offence was, or who committed it, in order to obtain a money laundering conviction.
Persons that:
will be guilty of the principal money laundering offence.
FUTURE AML/CTF REQUIREMENTS FOR LAWYERS
Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 - Tranche 2
In August 2007, the Federal government released for consultation a document entitled "Proposed Amendments to the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006” inserting additional designated services tables in order to comply with FATF Recommendations 12 and 16.
This draft legislation extends the list of designated services that are regulated under the AML/CTF Act to the following services carried out by lawyers (and other professionals) in the course of carrying on a business:
The problem with the proposed amendments is that they simply extend the obligations in the AML/CTF Act to cover lawyers (and other professionals) providing the services outlined above, without any qualifications or amendments to any of the other provisions of the AML/CTF Act (an approach which is inconsistent with the approach taken by FATF in its Recommendations).
Consultation
Currently, although comments on the draft legislation have been invited from individual members of the legal profession, the consultation process is restricted to consultation between government and the primary bodies representing the various affected professions.
The Law Council's comments on the Draft amending legislation can be found here.
Law Council of Australia
These can be found on the Law Council's website.
The FTRA does not require lawyers to identify and verify clients.
The AML/CTF Act does not currently require lawyers to identify and verify clients (unless they are regulated as reporting entities to the extent that they provide services that are in direct competition with the financial sector).
It is anticipated that the customer identification and verification obligations contained in the AML/CTF Act will apply to lawyers (at least to some extent) when they are regulated under Tranche 2 of the AML/CTF Act (see above under the heading FUTURE AML/CTF REQUIREMENTS FOR LAWYERS).
Under section 16A of the FTRA lawyers must report significant cash transactions
It is anticipated that lawyers will be required to report threshold transactions and suspicious matters under Tranche 2 of the AML/CTF Act but subject to legal professional privilege.
No information available
Information provided by:
Anna Lenahan, Partner, Allens Arthur Robinson Sydney
Telephone +612 9230 4132
Anna.Lenahan@aar.com.au
Judy Maguire, Senior Associate, Allens Arthur Robinson Sydney
Telephone +612 9230 4835
Judy.Maguire@aar.com.au
Sources:
1http://www.austrac.gov.au/amlctfact_reporting_implementation.html.