Isle of Man Constabulary – Financial Crime Unit
Yes
Lawyers are under an obligation to report any knowledge or suspicion that another person is engaged in laundering the proceeds of criminal conduct where the information or other matter on which that knowledge or suspicion is based came to his attention in the course of his profession, business or employment (Section 17J Criminal Justice Act 1990).
An identical obligation but relating to a knowledge or suspicion that another person is engaged in drug money laundering arises under Section 48 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1996. A discretionary enabling power to disclose a suspicion pr belief that money or property is or derived from terrorist funds arises under Section 10 of the Terrorist Act 1990. It should be noted that the Advocates` profession is currently outside the definition of regulated sector for the purpose of section 14 of the Anti-Terrorism and Crime Act 2003.
It should be noted that the mandatory disclosure requirements under section 17J Criminal Justice Act 1990 and section 48 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1996 – each provide an exception that is not an offence for a professional legal adviser to fail to disclose any information or other matter which comes to him in privileged circumstances although no information or other matter should be treated as coming to a professional legal advisor in privileged circumstances if it is communicated or given with a view to furthering any criminal purpose. The definition of what constitutes information or other matters coming to a professional legal adviser in privileged circumstances is defined within the relevant statutory sections.
In terms of anti-money laundering procedures, Advocates, insofar as they conduct any qualifying activity set out in schedule 1 to the Code, must comply with the provisions of the Code, and can face criminal prosecution under the Code for any breaches of the Code.
“Lawyer’s responsibilities:
Advocates, insofar as they told or manage client’s money, or directly conduct corporate and/or trust provider service business, must comply with the Anti-Money Laundering Code provisions relating to client’s identification and verification.
The Anti-Money Laundering code requires an initial identification procedure to be operated and thereafter requires information to be verified if there is a substantial change in the pattern of dealings or in the event that there is a suspicion that the client may be involved in a money laundering offence
The Anti-Money Laundering Code requires:
“Lawyers must see evidence confirming that names given for individuals or organisations are their true names that they exist and they can be contacted at the address given.
Lawyer must also collect sufficient information to confirm the legitimacy of the client’s business and source of funds, and to understand enough about the nature of the business and the proposed use of his legal service so that unusual and potentially suspicious transactions may be recognised.
Careful checking of evidence of identify is to be carried out at the start of a business relationship and for any single transaction or series of transactions exceeding 15,000 euro” 3
Where evidence is not forthcoming within a reasonable time from the same being requested, no further steps should be taken on the matter and you should notify the MLRO that the client has failed to provide all the necessary information.
No information available
Information provided by:
Meoiryn Shee-Ellan Vannin, Isle Of Man Constabulary – Financial Crime Unit
_______
Sources