South America

  AML Legislation Directly Applicable to Lawyers AML Legislation Indirectly Applicable to Lawyers [1] No or Limited AML Legislation in Place [2] Full Country Information not Available yet
Argentina (05/02/2014)  

   
Bolivia (05/09/2014)  

   
Brazil (01/04/2014)  

   
Chile (18/07/2014)  

   
Colombia (26/06/2014)  

   
Ecuador (28/10/2014)  

   
Guyana (27/04/2009)  

   
Paraguay (27/05/2014)  

   
Peru
(01/07/2014)
 

 ♦

   
Suriname      

Uruguay (25/06/2014)  

   
Venezuela (26/08/2009)  

   


NOTES:

1. This involves various scenarios, such as:

  1. Lawyers being subject to universal criminal liability;
  2. AML legislation applicable to specific lawyers’ roles only, eg, when acting as notary public or as a financial or corporate broker;
  3. Lawyers being subject to AML disciplinary rules designed specifically for legal professionals and administered by regulatory bodies.

2. This includes cases where there is AML legislation and general criminal law in place, but they are not directly or indirectly applicable to legal professionals.

3. Dates in brackets show the last update of the template. Please be aware that specific news might be reported after this date and they will appear at the bottom of the country page under the “Relevant News” section.

4. This chart has been adapted from each national contributor’s submission. The classifications followed in this chart may not correctly represent the status or application of the AML legislation in each jurisdiction for which the IBA Anti-Money Laundering Legislation Implementation Group takes no responsibility. We advise you to consult each country’s page directly and to verify the information through your own local research and counsel.

5. Click here for our full disclaimer for this website.